This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/9512: [3.4 regression] Segmentation fault if qualifying name of template explicit specialisation in namespace
- From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 1 May 2003 19:26:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/9512: [3.4 regression] Segmentation fault if qualifying name of template explicit specialisation in namespace
- Reply-to: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
The following reply was made to PR c++/9512; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
<vlukas@gmx.de>
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/9512: [3.4 regression] Segmentation fault if qualifying name of template explicit specialisation in namespace
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 21:09:23 +0200
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9512
The code is illegal: it's ill-formed to define a qualified namespace member
(Comeau correctly refuses it). So, we still have an ICE with 3.4 CVS
20030430, and we have an accept-illegal with 3.3 CVS 20030421 (which is not
a regression, since GCC has always illegally accepted this syntax).
Giovanni Bajo