This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: middle-end/7898: [Sparc] readdir_r gives bad results with gcc-3.1 and 3.2
- From: Danny Sadinoff <danny at sadinoff dot com>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 28 Apr 2003 20:26:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: middle-end/7898: [Sparc] readdir_r gives bad results with gcc-3.1 and 3.2
- Reply-to: Danny Sadinoff <danny at sadinoff dot com>
The following reply was made to PR middle-end/7898; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Danny Sadinoff <danny at sadinoff dot com>
To: ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc:
Subject: Re: middle-end/7898: [Sparc] readdir_r gives bad results with gcc-3.1 and 3.2
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:25:16 -0400
Oh. Boy, that's egg on my face. Thanks for taking the time.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 06:05:22PM -0000, ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de wrote:
> Synopsis: [Sparc] readdir_r gives bad results with gcc-3.1 and 3.2
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: cae
> State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 28 18:05:22 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
> This is a user error. readdir_r expects a struct dirent with at least
> NAME_MAX+1 characters allocated for d_name. However, declaring a normal
> struct dirent will only give you only a single byte.
> Besides none of this is under the control of gcc.
>
> regards Christian
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7898
>