This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/5247: [2003-01-22]ICE on default parameter in constructor which is reference to class
- From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 2 Apr 2003 02:16:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/5247: [2003-01-22]ICE on default parameter in constructor which is reference to class
- Reply-to: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
The following reply was made to PR c++/5247; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
To: <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<schmid at snake dot iap dot physik dot tu-darmstadt dot de>
Cc: "Wolfgang Bangerth" <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
Subject: Re: c++/5247: [2003-01-22]ICE on default parameter in constructor which is reference to class
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 04:07:23 +0200
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
r=5247
The testcase compiles on my 2.95:
$ g++-2 -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10/specs
gcc version 2.95.3-10 (cygwin special)
Can somebody double-check? If it really works with 2.95, this is a
regression and should be flagged as such.
Giovanni Bajo