This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/9868: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in c_expand_expr when qualifyingmember variable
- From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 27 Feb 2003 17:26:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/9868: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in c_expand_expr when qualifyingmember variable
- Reply-to: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
The following reply was made to PR c++/9868; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
Cc: <china at thewrittenword dot com>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
<gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Subject: Re: c++/9868: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in c_expand_expr when qualifying
member variable
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:18:22 +0100 (CET)
Hi,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> > Ahh, yes. I forgot. It would be interesting to know in which way our
> > compilers differ, that even the frontend behaves differently. Hmm.
>
> Valid question. I am building straight from CVS, on a SuSE 8 box. Are you
> using additional SuSE patches?
No. I tested multiple compilers. clean HEAD, clean 3.3, and clean
hammer-3_3-branch (Ok, the last with one patch to the backend, but it
can't matter).
> At any rate, 9868 seems to be a superset of the problem in 9524, so should
> 9868 be fixed, this would likely cure 9524 as well, and for both of us.
I would hope so too, yes.
Ciao,
Michael.