This is the mail archive of the gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: c++/9868: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in c_expand_expr when qualifyingmember variable


The following reply was made to PR c++/9868; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
Cc: <china at thewrittenword dot com>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,
	<gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Subject: Re: c++/9868: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in c_expand_expr when qualifying
 member variable
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:18:22 +0100 (CET)

 Hi,
 
 On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
 
 > > Ahh, yes. I forgot.  It would be interesting to know in which way our
 > > compilers differ, that even the frontend behaves differently.  Hmm.
 >
 > Valid question. I am building straight from CVS, on a SuSE 8 box. Are you
 > using additional SuSE patches?
 
 No.  I tested multiple compilers.  clean HEAD, clean 3.3, and clean
 hammer-3_3-branch (Ok, the last with one patch to the backend, but it
 can't matter).
 
 > At any rate, 9868 seems to be a superset of the problem in 9524, so should
 > 9868 be fixed, this would likely cure 9524 as well, and for both of us.
 
 I would hope so too, yes.
 
 
 Ciao,
 Michael.
 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]