This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/9868: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in c_expand_expr when qualifyingmember variable
- From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 27 Feb 2003 17:06:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/9868: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in c_expand_expr when qualifyingmember variable
- Reply-to: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
The following reply was made to PR c++/9868; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
Cc: china at thewrittenword dot com, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Subject: Re: c++/9868: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in c_expand_expr when qualifying
member variable
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:56:38 -0600 (CST)
> > Correct, at least close. I had a problem with 9524 before, and still have:
> > it doesn't ICE on mainline for me.
>
> Ahh, yes. I forgot. It would be interesting to know in which way our
> compilers differ, that even the frontend behaves differently. Hmm.
Valid question. I am building straight from CVS, on a SuSE 8 box. Are you
using additional SuSE patches?
At any rate, 9868 seems to be a superset of the problem in 9524, so should
9868 be fixed, this would likely cure 9524 as well, and for both of us.
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu
www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/