This is the mail archive of the gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: c++/9820: [3.3/3.4 regression] ice in build_baselink (templates)


The following reply was made to PR c++/9820; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org,
   gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, poschmid at lbl dot gov
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/9820: [3.3/3.4 regression] ice in build_baselink (templates)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:47:31 -0800

 The submitter says this test case should be valid,  but
 GCC 3.0.4 and the 3.2-branch both report errors.  I was
 planning to hunt for the patch that caused the regression,
 but if there's a test case that ICEs on legal code, I'd prefer
 to use that one.
 
 Output from GCC 3.2.2 20021220 (prerelease) with -w:
 
 9820.C: In instantiation of `IsFunctionT<int>':
 9820.C:23:   instantiated from `IsClassT<int>'
 9820.C:23:   instantiated from `void check() [with T = int]'
 9820.C:29:   instantiated from here
 9820.C:23: no method `IsFunctionT<int>::test<int>'
 9820.C:23: enumerator value for `Yes' not integer constant
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9820
 
 
 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]