This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/9569: 8 bytes seems to long for long long int
- From: Falk Hueffner <falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
- To: aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 6 Feb 2003 00:06:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: c/9569: 8 bytes seems to long for long long int
- Reply-to: Falk Hueffner <falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
The following reply was made to PR c/9569; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>, <aj@gcc.gnu.org>,
<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, <stefaandr@hotmail.com>,
<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c/9569: 8 bytes seems to long for long long int
Date: 06 Feb 2003 00:59:37 +0100
"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Neil Booth wrote:
>
> > Could you justify that, or re-open the bug report?
>
> Note that the bug report is actually a C++ bug report in the wrong
> category, and C++ doesn't have long long, and in the C++ compiler
> pedwarns (those that are enabled by default) are errors by default.
I still don't get it. In C99, this is perfectly legal code, and does
what the reporter wants. It is of course documented nowhere, but I
would assume that g++ inherits C99's long long semantics if long long
is enabled. Why not this part?
--
Falk