This is the mail archive of the gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libstdc++/9234: [3.3/3.4 regression] unary minus for valarrays broken


The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/9234; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@integrable-solutions.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
        gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/9234: [3.3/3.4 regression] unary minus for valarrays broken
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 22:08:44 +0100

 Hi Paolo,
 
 On  2 Feb, paolo@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 
 > Volker, Gaby approved your patch (see PR 9235). Could you
 > please commit it to both mainline and 3_3?
 
 I'm going to this tomorrrow morning. I wanted to do this earlier,
 but had trouble with the testsuite (I got a new computer and had
 some configury to do).
 
 In addition, I found another failure in valarray: operator!=() is
 broken, too, because of the following cut-n-paste error:
 
   struct __not_equal_to
   {
     template<typename _Tp>
       bool operator()(const _Tp& __x, const _Tp& __y) const
       { return __x == __y; }
                   ^^^^
   };
 
 I'll commit that (as obvious) and a testcase, too.
 
 > FYI, now in mainline the relevant code belongs to valarray_before.h,
 > ~ line 462.
 
 I already noticed, but thanks for the hint, anyway.
 
 Regards,
 Volker
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9234
 
 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]