This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap/4682: undefined reference to `target_flags'
- From: George dot R dot Goffe at seagate dot com
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 13 Jan 2002 23:46:02 -0000
- Subject: Re: bootstrap/4682: undefined reference to `target_flags'
- Reply-to: George dot R dot Goffe at seagate dot com
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/4682; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: George.R.Goffe@seagate.com
To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
george.goffe@seagate.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bootstrap/4682: undefined reference to `target_flags'
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:44:35 -0800
Craig,
There has to be a better way for me to report possible bugs.
I'm currently using gcc version 3.0.2 on my solaris 2.8 systems and am back
to being stuck in -liconv problems (i.e., unable to locate). For some
reason, CVS doesn't seem to get through to the CVS server (a firewall
issue?). Don't get me wrong, I'm NOT complaining about an almost 4 month
delay(?) in processing the bug report, I understand being busy. I have NOT
seen this bug since the October bug report but I can't tell since I have
NOT been able to build a gcc snapshot for over a month now. I'm not even
sure I could "re-create" the problem at this point.
I have sent an email to Paul Eggert (see enclosed below). I tried his
suggestion and have NOT seen utilities from other libraries than the
"prefix" libraries but I AM still seeing the libiconv missing problem.
This is with the current snapshot.
I think I'm gonna go back to selling used cars (small joke). This is prety
frustrating for me. I'm just trying to use the skills I have to help the
gcc effort among others. If you have any suggestions I'd be most happy to
"hear" them.
Regards,
George...
Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com> on 01/11/2002 10:49:14 PM
To: George.R.Goffe@seagate.com
cc:
Subject: Re: autoconf questioin.
> From: George.R.Goffe@seagate.com
> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:50:37 -0800
>
> Is there a way that I
> can tell configure that when it looks for software that's installed, to
> look at the --prefix= directories first?
Can't you prepend them to your PATH? Something like the following:
PATH=/your/prefix/bin:$PATH configure --prefix=/your/prefix