This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: tolerate padding in mbstate_t


On Jan 22, 2020, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:

>>> I don't think so, that wouldn't work. I think pos02 could just be
>>> removed from the test.

>> Will do.

> Thanks, OK to commit.

Thanks, here's what I tested and am about to install.


tolerate padding in mbstate_t

From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>

Padding in mbstate_t objects may get the memcmp to fail.
Attempt to avoid the failure with zero initialization.


for  libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog

	* testsuite/27_io/fpos/mbstate_t/1.cc: Zero-init mbstate_t.
---
 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/fpos/mbstate_t/1.cc |   28 +++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/fpos/mbstate_t/1.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/fpos/mbstate_t/1.cc
index f92d68f..28fec8e 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/fpos/mbstate_t/1.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/fpos/mbstate_t/1.cc
@@ -28,24 +28,38 @@
 void test01()
 {
   typedef std::mbstate_t state_type;
-  state_type state01 = state_type();
-  state_type state02 = state_type();
+  // Use zero-initialization of the underlying memory so that padding
+  // bytes, if any, stand a better chance of comparing the same.
+  // Zero-initialized memory is guaranteed to be a valid initial
+  // state.  This doesn't quite guarantee that any padding bits won't
+  // be overwritten when copying from other instances that haven't
+  // been fully initialized: this data type is compatible with C, so
+  // it is likely plain old data, but it could have a default ctor
+  // that initializes only the relevant fields, whereas copy-ctor and
+  // operator= could be implemented as a full-object memcpy, including
+  // padding bits, rather than fieldwise copying.  However, since
+  // we're comparing two values copied from the same state_type
+  // instance, if padding bits are copied, we'll get the same for both
+  // of them, and if they aren't, we'll keep the values we initialized
+  // them with, so this should be good.
+  state_type state[2];
+  std::memset(state, 0, sizeof (state));
+
 
   std::streampos pos01(0);
-  std::streampos pos02(0);
 
   // 27.4.3.1 fpos members
   // void state(state_type s);
   // state_type state();
 
   // XXX Need to have better sanity checking for the mbstate_t type,
-  // or whatever the insantiating type for class fpos happens to be
+  // or whatever the instantiating type for class fpos happens to be
   // for streampos, as things like equality operators and assignment
   // operators, increment and deincrement operators need to be in
   // place.
-  pos01.state(state02);
-  state01 = pos01.state();
-  VERIFY( std::memcmp(&state01, &state02, sizeof(state_type)) == 0 );
+  pos01.state(state[1]);
+  state[0] = pos01.state();
+  VERIFY( std::memcmp(&state[0], &state[1], sizeof(state_type)) == 0 );
 }
 
 int main() 


-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter   he/him   https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo
Free Software Evangelist           Stallman was right, but he's left :(
GNU Toolchain Engineer    FSMatrix: It was he who freed the first of us
FSF & FSFLA board member                The Savior shall return (true);


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]