This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Implement the <tuple> part of C++20 p1032 Misc constexpr bits.
- From: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Smith-Rowland, Edward M" <ESmith-rowland at alionscience dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Ed Smith-Rowland (3dw4rd at verizon dot net)" <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:47:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: Implement the <tuple> part of C++20 p1032 Misc constexpr bits.
- References: <df6f1faa65f64b2190ce1aeb4e843ac7@alionscience.com> <20191114155504.GG17072@redhat.com>
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 16:55, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 09/11/19 02:07 +0000, Smith-Rowland, Edward M wrote:
> >Here is the <tuple> part of C++20 p1032 Misc constexpr bits.
> >
> >Tested on x86_64-linux. OK?
>
> OK for trunk, thanks.
>
Hi,
The new test constexpr_allocator_arg_t.cc fails on arm and aarch64 and
many other targets according to gcc-testresults.
Is that expected?
Christophe