This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Optionally suppress no-automatic overwrites recursive warning - for approval

From: Mark Eggleston <mark dot eggleston at codethink dot co dot uk>
To: sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, fortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:37:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Optionally suppress no-automatic overwrites recursive warning - for approval
References: <5757e425-1980-f148-b870-6d93cfc41916@codethink.co.uk> <20190928165008.GA15489@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <f84fe6e2-2fa1-1a42-a569-78981a290673@codethink.co.uk>

PING - OK to commit?

On 02/10/2019 09:00, Mark Eggleston wrote:


On 28/09/2019 17:50, Steve Kargl wrote:

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:45:28AM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote:

Original thread starts here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg01185.html

OK to commit?

I'm not a big fan of option proliferation.  If you don't
want to see warns just use -w.  Of course, this is just
MHO.

Unfortunately -w switches off ALL warnings.

--
https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html

References:
- Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Optionally suppress no-automatic overwrites recursive warning - for approval
  - From: Mark Eggleston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]