This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC][Fortran,patch] %C error diagnostic location


Hi all,

I looked at error messages – and I like it. – Please review.

There is actually a "fallout": One testsuite case actually checks for the row location – I didn't even know that one can do it that way.

That's fixed by the attached patch (I also included the original patch).
OK for the trunk?

Tobias

PS: The effect of the patch can also be seen at the patch description at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00110.html

On 10/2/19 12:26 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi all,

my feeling is that %C locations are always off by one, e.g., showing the (1) under the last white-space character before the place where the error occurred – the match starts at the character after the gfc_current_location.

That bothered my for a while – but today, I was wondering whether one shouldn't simply bump the %C location by one – such that it shows at the first wrong character and not at the last okay character.

What do you think?


Another observation (unfixed): If gfortran buffers the error, the %C does not seem to get resolved at gfc_{error,warning} time but at the time when the buffer is flushed – which will have a reset error location.

Cheers,

Tobias

	* error (error_print, gfc_format_decoder): Fix off-by one issue with %C.

	* gfortran.dg/use_without_only_1.f90: Update column num in dg-warning.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/error.c b/gcc/fortran/error.c
index a0ce7a6b190..815cae9d7e7 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/error.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/error.c
@@ -618,12 +618,18 @@ error_print (const char *type, const char *format0, va_list argp)
 	      {
 		l2 = loc;
 		arg[pos].u.stringval = "(2)";
+		/* Point %C first offending character not the last good one. */
+		if (arg[pos].type == TYPE_CURRENTLOC)
+		  l2->nextc++;
 	      }
 	    else
 	      {
 		l1 = loc;
 		have_l1 = 1;
 		arg[pos].u.stringval = "(1)";
+		/* Point %C first offending character not the last good one. */
+		if (arg[pos].type == TYPE_CURRENTLOC)
+		  l1->nextc++;
 	      }
 	    break;
 
@@ -963,6 +969,9 @@ gfc_format_decoder (pretty_printer *pp, text_info *text, const char *spec,
 	  loc = va_arg (*text->args_ptr, locus *);
 	gcc_assert (loc->nextc - loc->lb->line >= 0);
 	unsigned int offset = loc->nextc - loc->lb->line;
+	if (*spec == 'C')
+	  /* Point %C first offending character not the last good one. */
+	  offset++;
 	/* If location[0] != UNKNOWN_LOCATION means that we already
 	   processed one of %C/%L.  */
 	int loc_num = text->get_location (0) == UNKNOWN_LOCATION ? 0 : 1;
@@ -1400,7 +1409,7 @@ gfc_internal_error (const char *gmsgid, ...)
 void
 gfc_clear_error (void)
 {
-  error_buffer.flag = 0;
+  error_buffer.flag = false;
   warnings_not_errors = false;
   gfc_clear_pp_buffer (pp_error_buffer);
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_without_only_1.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_without_only_1.f90
index 06af9853933..ad64b206b76 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_without_only_1.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_without_only_1.f90
@@ -6,16 +6,16 @@ MODULE foo
 END MODULE
 
 MODULE testmod
-  USE foo ! { dg-warning "6:has no ONLY qualifier" }
+  USE foo ! { dg-warning "7:has no ONLY qualifier" }
   IMPLICIT NONE
 CONTAINS
   SUBROUTINE S1
-     USE foo ! { dg-warning "9:has no ONLY qualifier" }
+     USE foo ! { dg-warning "10:has no ONLY qualifier" }
   END SUBROUTINE S1
   SUBROUTINE S2
      USE foo, ONLY: bar 
   END SUBROUTINE
   SUBROUTINE S3
-     USE ISO_C_BINDING ! { dg-warning "9:has no ONLY qualifier" }
+     USE ISO_C_BINDING ! { dg-warning "10:has no ONLY qualifier" }
   END SUBROUTINE S3
 END MODULE

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]