This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] libada: Respect `--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs'
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at wdc dot com>
- To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 01:40:27 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] libada: Respect `--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs'
- Ironport-sdr: V1FCvFOuEiWFaUt7GF77oHoJDIMKeRuv18QHv6vz92CERqAhr3AnliffIvrtqg2RuukOH7A3co RhW9wO15yIOD7p0bY0r2OLuXP9VT8ztPkhx4knFy4M2a3w0m86J504FdHC0x/E+/cYPWPklQSk iV239n2I9LTDKP6PySHAe9/FYQqkjXu76IIMgB4PyQal1uNh1okW6T4azEKhae8DLvsk13kvka 8a37StV0x6UJOj827dRNFloNdP7J1AHG5mpnG9lzRlrYuUmKQtCeYM1xNvIrMoqLMPCIdfPywF f4I=
- Ironport-sdr: Lh+IagqwxP1LMRFJsJt9isFkVRrAlfnr2jszd1V1octAY3FeyZaa4I7kXhMrZ0O2rqX/Wsfhh7 /irvPeYc7Afr2j/KWNP5XDN3oboaMnAc5A5tuNUlsAnWbCOQBftOAHBGxJnGVclLKJTlGDNqUf IPtN7Ulo1GuTqmw+IImEDu85NsuQrEGlESxPpOcrYGEd54u7eOIswHZeNkD9NioOTfABrGwPJV lmppaBXiVZXvNx3ks8wOLXu9nVMcFDiFOCzyB7wTddaLIc2LMtmZ1PPe+TwQVSaqOgtQtBVTEF LnWXPXLJKzn3gsYpP+xtsa84
- Ironport-sdr: t+k4BpG0W1zmPKQAWWiYWLkJrxlMeUAnx/M3eH1gA31whePD88Q0jLbkAPeb1CUo1AuPBuifcV tPRLSBMNzCICN20JmKiHgesoTywU2POBmijMQvYTwhcRx64mNly8i7j5cD52Xp25INQKrwQBWx jNCf/YeDWVD9h6YUXo8TsQDhOgAUoIrJkKdTybpYbq2CxFfOWqf4e23M2xvlcEZz/Hpl7iCprq 5qkrWErHOm7FyMadIXUl9zw3qtyIIwqDjWAPSmz+/rw/Dna6oqx7pCgeq6J+OOkGEOFxuJ0e8G uls=
- References: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1909251848350.28360@redsun52.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com> <alpine.LFD.2.21.1909252004290.28360@redsun52.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com> <20190926074651.GB12138@adacore.com> <alpine.LFD.2.21.1909261438010.28360@redsun52.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com> <20190926141449.GA20523@adacore.com>
- Wdcironportexception: Internal
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > Notice that ADA_RTL_OBJ_DIR never changes with/without the use of this
> > configuration option (as expected).
> >
> > Does it answer your question?
>
> Yes, that's now very clear, thanks!
Sorry not to make the original change description clear enough.
> The change is OK for me, thanks.
Thanks for your review.
Shall I amend the change description anyhow then? I know it has not (as
yet, as discussed at the GNU Tools Cauldron recently) been enforced for
the GCC project (unlike with e.g. glibc), however I mean to use it whole
as the commit message, which is what I have been doing for quite a while
now, because I recognise the value of change descriptions for future
repository examination.
Maciej