This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[SVE] PR91532
- From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh dot kulkarni at linaro dot org>
- To: Richard Sandiford <richard dot sandiford at arm dot com>, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, gcc Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:19:39 -0700
- Subject: [SVE] PR91532
Hi,
For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass
between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there ?
Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that
will clean up the dead store ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh