[C++ PATCH 2/4] Fix conversions for built-in operator overloading candidates.

[Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>]

While working on C++20 operator<=>, I noticed that build_new_op_1 was doing
too much conversion when a built-in candidate was selected; the standard
says it should only perform user-defined conversions, and then leave the
normal operator semantics to handle any standard conversions.  This is
important for operator<=> because a comparison of two different unscoped
enums is ill-formed; if we promote the enums to int here, cp_build_binary_op
never gets to see the original operand types, so we can't give the error.

Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.

	* call.c (build_new_op_1): Don't apply any standard conversions to
	the operands of a built-in operator.  Don't suppress conversions in
	cp_build_unary_op.
	* typeck.c (cp_build_unary_op): Do integral promotions for enums.
---
 gcc/cp/call.c    | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 gcc/cp/typeck.c  |  4 ++--
 gcc/cp/ChangeLog |  7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.c b/gcc/cp/call.c
index c3045d948c5..457fa6605c2 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.c
@@ -6139,41 +6139,40 @@ build_new_op_1 (const op_location_t &loc, enum tree_code code, int flags,
 	      break;
 	    }
 
-	  /* We need to strip any leading REF_BIND so that bitfields
-	     don't cause errors.  This should not remove any important
-	     conversions, because builtins don't apply to class
-	     objects directly.  */
+	  /* "If a built-in candidate is selected by overload resolution, the
+	     operands of class type are converted to the types of the
+	     corresponding parameters of the selected operation function,
+	     except that the second standard conversion sequence of a
+	     user-defined conversion sequence (12.3.3.1.2) is not applied."  */
 	  conv = cand->convs[0];
-	  if (conv->kind == ck_ref_bind)
-	    conv = next_conversion (conv);
-	  arg1 = convert_like (conv, arg1, complain);
+	  if (conv->user_conv_p)
+	    {
+	      while (conv->kind != ck_user)
+		conv = next_conversion (conv);
+	      arg1 = convert_like (conv, arg1, complain);
+	    }
 
 	  if (arg2)
 	    {
 	      conv = cand->convs[1];
-	      if (conv->kind == ck_ref_bind)
-		conv = next_conversion (conv);
-	      else
-		arg2 = decay_conversion (arg2, complain);
-
-	      /* We need to call warn_logical_operator before
-		 converting arg2 to a boolean_type, but after
-		 decaying an enumerator to its value.  */
-	      if (complain & tf_warning)
-		warn_logical_operator (loc, code, boolean_type_node,
-				       code_orig_arg1, arg1,
-				       code_orig_arg2, arg2);
-
-	      arg2 = convert_like (conv, arg2, complain);
+	      if (conv->user_conv_p)
+		{
+		  while (conv->kind != ck_user)
+		    conv = next_conversion (conv);
+		  arg2 = convert_like (conv, arg2, complain);
+		}
 	    }
+
 	  if (arg3)
 	    {
 	      conv = cand->convs[2];
-	      if (conv->kind == ck_ref_bind)
-		conv = next_conversion (conv);
-	      convert_like (conv, arg3, complain);
+	      if (conv->user_conv_p)
+		{
+		  while (conv->kind != ck_user)
+		    conv = next_conversion (conv);
+		  arg3 = convert_like (conv, arg3, complain);
+		}
 	    }
-
 	}
     }
 
@@ -6241,7 +6240,7 @@ build_new_op_1 (const op_location_t &loc, enum tree_code code, int flags,
     case REALPART_EXPR:
     case IMAGPART_EXPR:
     case ABS_EXPR:
-      return cp_build_unary_op (code, arg1, candidates != 0, complain);
+      return cp_build_unary_op (code, arg1, false, complain);
 
     case ARRAY_REF:
       return cp_build_array_ref (input_location, arg1, arg2, complain);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
index 70094d1b426..620f2c9afdf 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -6242,7 +6242,7 @@ cp_build_unary_op (enum tree_code code, tree xarg, bool noconvert,
 		       : _("wrong type argument to unary plus"));
 	else
 	  {
-	    if (!noconvert && CP_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg)))
+	    if (!noconvert && INTEGRAL_OR_ENUMERATION_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg)))
 	      arg = cp_perform_integral_promotions (arg, complain);
 
 	    /* Make sure the result is not an lvalue: a unary plus or minus
@@ -6267,7 +6267,7 @@ cp_build_unary_op (enum tree_code code, tree xarg, bool noconvert,
 						   | WANT_VECTOR_OR_COMPLEX,
 						   arg, true)))
 	errstring = _("wrong type argument to bit-complement");
-      else if (!noconvert && CP_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg)))
+      else if (!noconvert && INTEGRAL_OR_ENUMERATION_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg)))
 	{
 	  /* Warn if the expression has boolean value.  */
 	  if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (arg)) == BOOLEAN_TYPE
diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
index e92d49f1b76..a03a428109b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2019-09-15  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
+
+	* call.c (build_new_op_1): Don't apply any standard conversions to
+	the operands of a built-in operator.  Don't suppress conversions in
+	cp_build_unary_op.
+	* typeck.c (cp_build_unary_op): Do integral promotions for enums.
+
 2019-09-15  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>
 
 	PR c++/91740 - ICE with constexpr call and ?: in ARRAY_REF.
-- 
2.21.0