This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [1/9] Simplify the implementation of HARD_REG_SET

From: Oleg Endo <oleg dot endo at t-online dot de>
To: Richard Sandiford <richard dot sandiford at arm dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:16:35 +0900
Subject: Re: [1/9] Simplify the implementation of HARD_REG_SET
References: <mptv9u18o2j.fsf@arm.com> <mptr24p8nzh.fsf@arm.com> <15887a75-8c04-892d-6054-a7782f13350f@redhat.com> <mptv9u15or8.fsf@arm.com>

On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 19:05 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> 
> Yeah.  I might come back to this later and look at a fuller
> transition
> to C++ (or at least to try to get rid of CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET).
> 

Maybe you can just typedef it to std::bitset ;)

Cheers,
Oleg

References:
- [0/9] Make HARD_REG_SETs easier to use
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- [1/9] Simplify the implementation of HARD_REG_SET
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: [1/9] Simplify the implementation of HARD_REG_SET
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [1/9] Simplify the implementation of HARD_REG_SET
  - From: Richard Sandiford

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]