This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] bring -Warray-bounds closer to -Wstringop-overflow (PR91647, 91463, 91679)

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 11:56:18 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bring -Warray-bounds closer to -Wstringop-overflow (PR91647, 91463, 91679)
References: <f80f84af-4f40-5af6-1b5f-88feafb589cc@gmail.com> <6f596f6e-a388-4a84-0391-7b50c93622fc@gmail.com>

On 9/6/19 5:26 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Just a heads up that I tested the patch with Glibc and the kernel.
> It exposes some of the same "abuses" of (near) zero-length arrays
> as the most recent improvement in this area.  In glibc, it
> complains about code in fileops.c, iofwide.c, libc-tls.c, and
> rtld.c.  The ones I looked at all look like the last one we saw.
> I'll look into how to deal with them next.  In the kernel it
> issues a variety of warnings that I need to investigate after
> I get back from Cauldron.
THanks.  Good to know.

jeff

References:
- [PATCH] bring -Warray-bounds closer to -Wstringop-overflow (PR91647, 91463, 91679)
  - From: Martin Sebor
- Re: [PATCH] bring -Warray-bounds closer to -Wstringop-overflow (PR91647, 91463, 91679)
  - From: Martin Sebor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]