This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Prevent LTO section collision for a symbol name starting with '*'.


PING^1

On 8/26/19 12:04 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Ok. I have a semi-working patch that has issues for inline clones.
> When we call cgraph_node::get_untransformed_body for an inline clone,
> then one needs to use clone_of->order to find proper LTO stream.
> 
> What's more problematic is that such clone can be expanded:
> 
> f/12 (f) @0x7ffff769f708
>   Type: function definition analyzed
>   Visibility: external public
>   References: mumble.lto_priv.0/8 (write)
>   Referring: 
>   Read from file: /tmp/cciAkXHp.ltrans1.o
>   Function f/12 is inline copy in main/0
>   Availability: local
>   Function flags: count:1073741824 (estimated locally) local nonfreeing_fn executed_once
>   Called by: main/0 (inlined) (1073741824 (estimated locally),1.00 per call) 
>   Calls: 
> 
> and lost. So we end up with an orphan and we ICE with:
> 
> /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20081112_0.c: In function ‘main’:
> /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20081112_0.c:10:3: fatal error: /tmp/cciAkXHp.ltrans1.o: section f is missing
> 
> So usage of symtab_node::order seems awkward to me :/
> 
> Martin
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]