This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH V6 05/11] bpf: new GCC port
- From: jose dot marchesi at oracle dot com (Jose E. Marchesi)
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch at gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, richard dot sandiford at arm dot com
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:50:05 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 05/11] bpf: new GCC port
- References: <20190829151347.13536-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com> <87sgpkgfpz.fsf@gnu.org> <mpto907m67b.fsf@arm.com> <87h85zf0td.fsf@oracle.com> <6055ae30-5c7c-f990-0605-9ee09c492fd0@redhat.com>
[Resending this email, because for some reason it seems it didn't reach
the list a couple of days ago.]
I think the bits are in good enough shape they can go in now.
Thanks!
I guess I should wait for acceptance of the remaining patches not having
an explicit ack?
To my recollection, and to summarize, the accepted patches are:
- [PATCH V6 01/11] Update config.sub and config.guess.
- [PATCH V6 05/11] bpf: new GCC port
- [PATCH V6 06/11] bpf: new libgcc port
- [PATCH V6 07/11] bpf: gcc.target eBPF testsuite
- [PATCH V6 10/11] bpf: manual updates for eBPF
This leaves the following patches that still need explicit approval:
- [PATCH V6 02/11] opt-functions.awk: fix comparison of limit, begin and end
- [PATCH V6 03/11] testsuite: annotate c-torture/compile tests with dg-require-stack-size
- [PATCH V6 04/11] testsuite: new require effective target indirect_calls
- [PATCH V6 08/11] bpf: make target-supports.exp aware of eBPF
- [PATCH V6 09/11] bpf: adjust GCC testsuite to eBPF limitations
- [PATCH V6 11/11] bpf: add myself as the maintainer for the eBPF port
Also, you mentioned this requires steering committee approval:
- [PATCH V6 11/11] bpf: add myself as the maintainer for the eBPF port
How to get it?