This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ARM/FDPIC v5 13/21] [ARM] FDPIC: Force LSB bit for PC in Cortex-M architecture
- From: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>
- To: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo dot tkachov at foss dot arm dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
- Cc: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at st dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 10:31:51 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ARM/FDPIC v5 13/21] [ARM] FDPIC: Force LSB bit for PC in Cortex-M architecture
- References: <20190515124006.25840-1-christophe.lyon@st.com> <20190515124006.25840-14-christophe.lyon@st.com> <19a091e0-c1fe-c4f7-5eab-5e09ab1de3fd@foss.arm.com> <CAKdteOatA8fxZR9rR56uJ+zVc0M1ZrMXfqTtAMZprSY96cRj5A@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry, I forgot again to cc: Ian.
Thanks,
Christophe
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 10:30, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 17:32, Kyrill Tkachov
> <kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Christophe,
> >
> > On 5/15/19 1:39 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > > Without this, when we are unwinding across a signal frame we can jump
> > > to an even address which leads to an exception.
> > >
> > > This is needed in __gnu_persnality_sigframe_fdpic() when restoring the
> > > PC from the signal frame since the PC saved by the kernel has the LSB
> > > bit set to zero.
> > >
> > > 2019-XX-XX Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@st.com>
> > > Mickaël Guêné <mickael.guene@st.com>
> > >
> > > libgcc/
> > > * config/arm/unwind-arm.c (_Unwind_VRS_Set): Handle v7m
> > > architecture.
> > >
> > > Change-Id: Ie84de548226bcf1751e19a09e8f091fb3013ccea
> > >
> > > diff --git a/libgcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c
> > > b/libgcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c
> > > index 9ba73e7..ba47150 100644
> > > --- a/libgcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c
> > > +++ b/libgcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c
> > > @@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ _Unwind_VRS_Result _Unwind_VRS_Set
> > > (_Unwind_Context *context,
> > > return _UVRSR_FAILED;
> > >
> > > vrs->core.r[regno] = *(_uw *) valuep;
> > > +#if defined(__ARM_ARCH_7M__)
> > > + /* Force LSB bit since we always run thumb code. */
> > > + if (regno == 15)
> > > + vrs->core.r[regno] |= 1;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Hmm, this looks quite specific. There are other architectures that are
> > thumb-only too (6-M, 7E-M etc).
> >
> > Would checking for __thumb__ be better?
> >
> Right.
> The attached updated patch also uses R_PC instead of 15.
>
> Christophe
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Kyrill
> >
> >
> > > return _UVRSR_OK;
> > >
> > > case _UVRSC_VFP:
> > > --
> > > 2.6.3
> > >