This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Canonicalization of compares performed as side-effect operations

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:48:17 +0200
Subject: Re: Canonicalization of compares performed as side-effect operations
References: <bc94810b-140c-71d4-eca5-9e2c6efae2f7@arm.com> <1787435.c30AEktzrP@arcturus.home> <11fbdb71-c562-27f4-dc94-6c94119bda39@arm.com>

[Sorry for the delay, I missed your question...]

> Interesting.  Does it work for the general case of a reverse subtract,
> which I need to handle as wel?

Not clear, Visium only uses it for SNE and combined NEG/SNE.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Canonicalization of compares performed as side-effect operations
  - From: Richard Earnshaw (lists)

References:
- Canonicalization of compares performed as side-effect operations
  - From: Richard Earnshaw (lists)
- Re: Canonicalization of compares performed as side-effect operations
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Canonicalization of compares performed as side-effect operations
  - From: Richard Earnshaw (lists)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]