This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH,Fortran] -- Tidy up the BOZ rewrite

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at netcologne dot de>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:54:30 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH,Fortran] -- Tidy up the BOZ rewrite
References: <20190808231044.GA62255@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <02b98103-cf25-9a67-839c-ac411a5535d7@netcologne.de>
Reply-to: sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu

On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 07:29:10PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> > OK to commit?
> 
> OK with
> 
> %s/rational/relational/g
> 
> and with Mark's nit.
> 
> Thanks a lot for going down that road.  I like the approach of
> -fallow-invalid-boz to downgrade the error to a warning, which
> then cannot be turned off.
> 

Thanks, I'll double check spelling.  Not one of my stronger abilitie.

You can turn off the warning with -w, but that turns off
all warnings. :-)  I suspect we'll get a PR or two to 
provide an option to turn off the warning.

I think part of the rework that others will appreciate is
one no longer needs to use -fno-range-check.

-- 
Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH,Fortran] -- Tidy up the BOZ rewrite
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- [PATCH,Fortran] -- Tidy up the BOZ rewrite
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [PATCH,Fortran] -- Tidy up the BOZ rewrite
  - From: Thomas Koenig

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]