This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] Improve delete_sanity locations


On 7/24/19 5:24 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
this takes care of the four locations, two warnings and two errors. I'm also adding the missing complain & tf_warning or tf_error guards, I don't have a SFINAE testcase failing but since the function takes a tsubst_flags_t argument I think it's the right thing to do. Tested x86_64-linux.

OK.

By the way, shall we add to cp-tree.h, at least temporarily, a:

inline location_t
cp_expr_loc_or_loc (const_tree t)
{
   return cp_expr_loc_or_loc (t, input_location);
}

overload? We could use it in a ton of places.

I'd call it "cp_expr_loc_or_here". But David removed EXPR_LOC_OR_HERE a few years back, so I'd like him to weigh in.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]