Re: [C++ Patch] Improve delete_sanity locations

[Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>]

On 7/24/19 5:24 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> this takes care of the four locations, two warnings and two errors. I'm 
> also adding the missing complain & tf_warning or tf_error guards, I 
> don't have a SFINAE testcase failing but since the function takes a 
> tsubst_flags_t argument I think it's the right thing to do. Tested 
> x86_64-linux.

OK.

> By the way, shall we add to cp-tree.h, at least temporarily, a:
>
> inline location_t
> cp_expr_loc_or_loc (const_tree t)
> {
>    return cp_expr_loc_or_loc (t, input_location);
> }
>
> overload? We could use it in a ton of places.

I'd call it "cp_expr_loc_or_here".  But David removed EXPR_LOC_OR_HERE a 
few years back, so I'd like him to weigh in.

Jason