This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Come up with function_decl_type and use it in tree_function_decl.


On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:02 PM Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/11/19 12:45 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 7/9/19 11:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> > Ok, I hopefully addressed the suggested improvements to the patch.
> >
> > Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
> >
> > Ready to be installed?
> > Thanks,
> > Martin
> >
> > 0001-Extend-DCE-to-remove-unnecessary-new-delete-pairs-PR.patch
> >
> > From 771d9128144745fe530577912521fc8228ca7424 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
> > Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 09:08:27 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] Extend DCE to remove unnecessary new/delete-pairs (PR
> >  c++/23383).
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2019-07-02  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
> >           Dominik Infuhr  <dominik.infuehr@theobroma-systems.com>
> >
> >       PR c++/23383
> >       * common.opt: Add -fallocation-dce
> >       * gimple.c (gimple_call_operator_delete_p): New.
> >       * gimple.h (gimple_call_operator_delete_p): Likewise.
> >       * tree-core.h (enum function_decl_type): Add OPERATOR_DELETE.
> >       * tree-ssa-dce.c (mark_stmt_if_obviously_necessary): Handle
> >       DECL_IS_OPERATOR_DELETE_P.
> >       (mark_all_reaching_defs_necessary_1): Likewise.
> >       (propagate_necessity): Likewise.
> >       (eliminate_unnecessary_stmts): Handle
> >       gimple_call_operator_delete_p.
> >       * tree-streamer-in.c (unpack_ts_function_decl_value_fields):
> >       Add packing of OPERATOR_DELETE.
> >       * tree-streamer-out.c (pack_ts_function_decl_value_fields):
> >       Similarly here.
> >       * tree.h (DECL_IS_OPERATOR_DELETE_P): New.
> >       (DECL_SET_IS_OPERATOR_DELETE): New.
> >       (DECL_IS_REPLACEABLE_OPERATOR_NEW_P): Likewise.
> >
> > gcc/c/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2019-07-02  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
> >           Dominik Infuhr  <dominik.infuehr@theobroma-systems.com>
> >
> >       PR c++/23383
> >       * c-decl.c (merge_decls): Merge OPERATOR_DELETE flag.
> >
> > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2019-07-02  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
> >           Dominik Infuhr  <dominik.infuehr@theobroma-systems.com>
> >
> >       PR c++/23383
> >       * decl.c (cxx_init_decl_processing): Mark delete operators
> >       with DECL_SET_IS_OPERATOR_DELETE.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2019-07-02  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz
> >           Dominik Infuhr  <dominik.infuehr@theobroma-systems.com>
> >
> >       PR c++/23383
> >       * g++.dg/cpp1y/new1.C: New test.
> >
> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2019-07-02  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
> >           Dominik Infuhr  <dominik.infuehr@theobroma-systems.com>
> >
> >       PR c++/23383
> >       * testsuite/ext/bitmap_allocator/check_delete.cc: Add
> >       -fno-allocation-dce.
> >       * testsuite/ext/bitmap_allocator/check_new.cc: Likewise.
> >       * testsuite/ext/new_allocator/check_delete.cc: Likewise.
> >       * testsuite/ext/new_allocator/check_new.cc: Likewise.
> OK.
>
> I don't see the 2/2 from this series in my queue.  Has it already been
> dealt with?

You approved 2/2.

1/2 is OK as well.

Thanks,
Richard.

>
> jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]