This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH], Patch #10, move PowerPC data structures & helper functions from rs6000.c to rs6000-internal.h
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- To: Michael Meissner <meissner at linux dot ibm dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:50:07 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH], Patch #10, move PowerPC data structures & helper functions from rs6000.c to rs6000-internal.h
- References: <20190628000602.GA24286@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org> <20190720161308.GA6730@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org> <CAGWvny=TyEVQSBZxx81xYj901zm3m+wP976o0TExRb=dtue+_A@mail.gmail.com> <20190722183453.GA30230@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 02:34:53PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:28:34PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > This patch needs to add rs6000-internal.h to tm_file in gcc/config.gcc
> > for all of the powerpc/rs6000 targets. It also may need tm_p_file and
> > tm_d_file definitions.
> While I agree it would make things easier if the declarations are available to
> everybody, why wasn't this an issue when rs6000-internal.h was created to allow
> stuff to move out from rs6000.c to rs6000-logues.c?
AIUI it is mostly needed to get dependencies right?