This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, c++ openmp] Improve diagnostics for unmappable types

From: Andrew Stubbs <ams at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:56:53 +0100
Subject: Re: [patch, c++ openmp] Improve diagnostics for unmappable types
References: <9471094d-05b6-0196-02c5-f7868f139332@codesourcery.com> <b4839df8-e4cb-4e89-dbb3-2f09f945694a@redhat.com> <f89cd236-84ad-3591-c677-a53b2ede224d@codesourcery.com> <2b79b444-1c95-b821-d472-a1304f363441@redhat.com> <107c7b3d-fd9d-103a-3c23-84a7f78cd99a@codesourcery.com> <20190708221028.GL815@tucnak>

On 08/07/2019 23:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

This broke following testcase.
error_mark_node type isn't really incomplete, it is errorneous, doesn't have
TYPE_MAIN_DECL and we should have diagnosed it earlier, so it makes no sense
to emit extra explanation messages.

Apologies. Did I miss something in the regression tests? _Atomic-5 seemsfine?


Andrew

References:
- Re: [patch, c++ openmp] Improve diagnostics for unmappable types
  - From: Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [patch, c++ openmp] Improve diagnostics for unmappable types
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [patch, c++ openmp] Improve diagnostics for unmappable types
  - From: Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [patch, c++ openmp] Improve diagnostics for unmappable types
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]