This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Come up with function_decl_type and use it in tree_function_decl.


On 7/2/19 7:15 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
> 
>> After the discussion with Richi and Nathan, I made a place in tree_function_decl
>> and I rebased the original Dominik's patch on top of that.
> 
> So, last time there were some questions about the legality of this transformation. Did you change the exact set of functions on which this is applied?

Yes. I was not included in the original discussion, but I hope the transformation is valid.
Btw. clang also removes the new/delete pairs and I guess it was the original motivation of the patch.

Martin

Or has there been a clarification in the standard saying that this is ok? (or were we mistaken the first time to believe that there might be an issue?)
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]