[patch] Fix coarray_lock_7.f90 test failure

[Andrew Stubbs <ams at codesourcery dot com>]

The coarray_lock_7.f90 test has fixed-width patterns for matching the 
variable numbers in the dumps. This has caused recent test failures for 
at least amdgcn because changes elsewhere have happened to increase 
those numbers too far.

This patch adds a "\\d+" match to allow variable-width matches.

OK to commit?

Andrew

Fix new coarray failures.

2019-05-22  Andrew Stubbs  <ams@codesourcery.com>

	gcc/testsuite/
	* gfortran.dg/coarray_lock_7.f90: Fix output patterns.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_lock_7.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_lock_7.f90
index aedb2267413..4f4bdde856d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_lock_7.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_lock_7.f90
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ end
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_lock \\(caf_token.., 0, 0, 0B, 0B, 0B, 0\\);" 1 "original" } }
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_unlock \\(caf_token.., 0, 0, 0B, 0B, 0\\);" 1 "original" } }
 
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_lock \\(caf_token.., .*\\(\\(3 - parm....dim\\\[0\\\].lbound\\) \\+ \\(MAX_EXPR <parm....dim\\\[0\\\].ubound - parm....dim\\\[0\\\].lbound, -1> \\+ 1\\) \\* \\(3 - parm....dim\\\[1\\\].lbound\\)\\), 0, 0B, &ii, 0B, 0\\);|_gfortran_caf_lock \\(caf_token.1, \\(3 - parm....dim\\\[0\\\].lbound\\) \\+ \\(MAX_EXPR <parm....dim\\\[0\\\].ubound - parm....dim\\\[0\\\].lbound, -1> \\+ 1\\) \\* \\(3 - parm....dim\\\[1\\\].lbound\\), 0, 0B, &ii, 0B, 0\\);" 1 "original" } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_unlock \\(caf_token.., .*\\(\\(2 - parm....dim\\\[0\\\].lbound\\) \\+ \\(MAX_EXPR <parm....dim\\\[0\\\].ubound - parm....dim\\\[0\\\].lbound, -1> \\+ 1\\) \\* \\(3 - parm....dim\\\[1\\\].lbound\\)\\), 0, &ii, 0B, 0\\);|_gfortran_caf_unlock \\(caf_token.., \\(2 - parm....dim\\\[0\\\].lbound\\) \\+ \\(MAX_EXPR <parm....dim\\\[0\\\].ubound - parm....dim\\\[0\\\].lbound, -1> \\+ 1\\) \\* \\(3 - parm....dim\\\[1\\\].lbound\\), 0, &ii, 0B, 0\\);" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_lock \\(caf_token.., .*\\(\\(3 - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound\\) \\+ \\(MAX_EXPR <parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].ubound - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound, -1> \\+ 1\\) \\* \\(3 - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[1\\\].lbound\\)\\), 0, 0B, &ii, 0B, 0\\);|_gfortran_caf_lock \\(caf_token.1, \\(3 - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound\\) \\+ \\(MAX_EXPR <parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].ubound - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound, -1> \\+ 1\\) \\* \\(3 - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[1\\\].lbound\\), 0, 0B, &ii, 0B, 0\\);" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_unlock \\(caf_token.., .*\\(\\(2 - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound\\) \\+ \\(MAX_EXPR <parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].ubound - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound, -1> \\+ 1\\) \\* \\(3 - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[1\\\].lbound\\)\\), 0, &ii, 0B, 0\\);|_gfortran_caf_unlock \\(caf_token.., \\(2 - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound\\) \\+ \\(MAX_EXPR <parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].ubound - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound, -1> \\+ 1\\) \\* \\(3 - parm.\\d+.dim\\\[1\\\].lbound\\), 0, &ii, 0B, 0\\);" 1 "original" } }
 
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_lock \\(three.token, 0, \\(integer\\(kind=4\\)\\) \\(5 - three.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound\\), &acquired.\[0-9\]+, 0B, 0B, 0\\);|_gfortran_caf_lock \\(three.token, 0, 5 - three.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound, &acquired.\[0-9\]+, 0B, 0B, 0\\);" 1 "original" } }
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_unlock \\(three.token, 0, \\(integer\\(kind=4\\)\\) \\(8 - three.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound\\), &ii, 0B, 0\\);|_gfortran_caf_unlock \\(three.token, 0, 8 - three.dim\\\[0\\\].lbound, &ii, 0B, 0\\);" 1 "original" } }