This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add workaround for broken C/C++ wrappers to LAPACK (PR fortran/90329)

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at charter dot net>
To: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist dot janne at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 15:08:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add workaround for broken C/C++ wrappers to LAPACK (PR fortran/90329)
References: <20190516080930.GR19695@tucnak> <60cf5cf1-8d1d-d95c-93f5-912d96c42870@redhat.com> <5cc0561a-d6da-bba7-1fb1-135bb9adb2bf@charter.net> <CAO9iq9HsWx1TdfshEkuJeFrYhRXGRUmDc4wS80_5X=TPGqqjeA@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/17/19 12:33 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:

--- snip ---

And yes, while I think one year might be a quite optimistic timeframe
to get this fixed, I agree we shouldn't keep the workaround
indefinitely either. I think the best way would be if CBLAS & LAPACKE
would be fixed, and then we could tell people to use those rather than
their own in-house broken interfaces.


Thankyou for clarifying, so the real bug here is in CBLAS and LAPACK? Gads!

Cheers,

Jerry

References:
- [PATCH] Add workaround for broken C/C++ wrappers to LAPACK (PR fortran/90329)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Add workaround for broken C/C++ wrappers to LAPACK (PR fortran/90329)
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [PATCH] Add workaround for broken C/C++ wrappers to LAPACK (PR fortran/90329)
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [PATCH] Add workaround for broken C/C++ wrappers to LAPACK (PR fortran/90329)
  - From: Janne Blomqvist

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]