Re: [RS6000] PR89271, gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-simode2.c

[Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:15:54PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:10:06AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > Also, using a register move cost of 2 for for power9 direct moves
> > gives these fails, even with the .md file tweaks:
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-set-char.c scan-assembler-not mtvsrwz
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-set-char.c scan-assembler vspltisb
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-set-char.c scan-assembler xxspltib
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-set-int.c scan-assembler-not mtvsrwz
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-set-int.c scan-assembler vspltisw
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-set-short.c scan-assembler-not mtvsrwz
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-set-short.c scan-assembler vspltish
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vec-set-short.c scan-assembler xxspltib
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-himode3.c scan-assembler lxsihzx
> > +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-qimode3.c scan-assembler lxsibzx
> > These can be all be fixed by removing "?"s disparaging vector
> > alternatives in movsi_internal1 and mov<mode>_internal.
> 
> Like this.  Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64le-linux.
> OK for stage1?

Yup, together with the previous patch.  Thanks,


Segher