This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] PR target/52813 and target/11807
- From: Richard Sandiford <richard dot sandiford at arm dot com>
- To: Dimitar Dimitrov <dimitar at dinux dot eu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:52:17 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] PR target/52813 and target/11807
- References: <20181209100856.14051-1-dimitar@dinux.eu> <87woohsk32.fsf@arm.com> <2807771.CbC4dySGB1@tpdeb>
Dimitar Dimitrov <dimitar@dinux.eu> writes:
> On понеделник, 10 декември 2018 г. 11:21:53 EET Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Dimitar Dimitrov <dimitar@dinux.eu> writes:
>> > I have tested this fix on x86_64 host, and found no regression in the C
>> > and C++ testsuites. I'm marking this patch as RFC simply because I don't
>> > have experience with other architectures, and I don't have a setup to
>> > test all architectures supported by GCC.
>> >
>> > gcc/ChangeLog:
>> >
>> > 2018-12-07 Dimitar Dimitrov <dimitar@dinux.eu>
>> >
>> > * cfgexpand.c (asm_clobber_reg_is_valid): Also produce
>> > error when stack pointer is clobbered.
>> > (expand_asm_stmt): Refactor clobber check in separate function.
>> >
>> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> >
>> > 2018-12-07 Dimitar Dimitrov <dimitar@dinux.eu>
>> >
>> > * gcc.target/i386/pr52813.c: New test.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <dimitar@dinux.eu>
>>
>> LGTM. Do you have a copyright assignment on file? 'Fraid this is
>> probably big enough to need one.
> Yes, I have copyright assignment.
OK, great. I went ahead and applied the patch.
Thanks,
Richard