This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR86957

Hi Indu!

I recently saw that you just started contributing to GCC, so: welcome,
and enjoy to journey!

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:54:09 -0800, Indu Bhagat <> wrote:
> On 12/06/2018 05:54 PM, Indu Bhagat wrote:
> > [...]

Thanks for looking into this issue again.  As I said in private email,
such things (like looking at the wrong build's test logs) happen to all
of us.  As long as we learn -- or, at least try to learn ;-) -- something
from that, that's fine, as far as I'm concerned.

Evidently, the peer review/collaboration that we have in these Free
Software/Open Source software projects worked, and we eventually caught
this issue.  :-)

> > 2. I do however see other tests (a total of 23) which are have 
> > regressed from
> >    PASS --> UNRESOLVED. A diff is attached.
> >
> >    Each one of them is due to "Error/Warning threshold exceeded: 1 0 
> > (max. 1 3)"
> False alarm.
> Looks like there is some flakiness I ran into.

Anything we could help you with, or that you have questions about?

> New testsuite runs (make check-gcc) on a fresh builds of the GCC (with 
> and without missing-profile) enabled look OK.
> One additional failure as expected (Wmissing-profile.c). No additional 
> unresolved tests.

Good, thanks for verifying!


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]