This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 10/10] Port testsuite to GCN
- From: Andrew Stubbs <ams at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 16:10:16 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] Port testsuite to GCN
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <693FC594-0F70-46AC-916D-C923F966ED1B@comcast.net> <0767D01A-7D1A-4FD0-84C9-47C11DDCC04D@comcast.net>
On 26/11/2018 21:13, Mike Stump wrote:
On Nov 26, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Mike Stump <email@example.com> wrote:
I'll Ok the signal one, if you prefer it over a dummy signal routine. Though, would be nice for you to add signal if possible/reasonable.
Oh, and my long term thinking on signal is that logically, it's fine to have:
This doesn't work here because we have signal.h (and indeed "signal").
The problem is that the function doesn't work (actually, it doesn't
link, because "kill" is missing).
I've solved the problem by adding a machine-specific stub function in
Newlib, so we can drop this portion of the patch from the testsuite now.