This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Allow TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY hook to reduce priority

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, John David Anglin <dave dot anglin at bell dot net>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:30:39 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Allow TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY hook to reduce priority
References: <0339d94b-e63b-d4b5-ee11-04133ad2b418@bell.net> <175a9d44-219f-12c5-e669-60674e82ab2d@redhat.com> <mvm1sa1edj9.fsf@suse.de> <5d6d3ad1-41f5-2a73-ffbf-cb883ab1ffbc@bell.net> <mvm1s9sze2u.fsf@suse.de>

On 9/17/18 3:08 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> 	PR rtl-optimization/85458
> 	* sel-sched.c (sel_target_adjust_priority): Remove wrong
> 	assertion.
Under what conditions is the new priority negative?  Without digging
deep into the ia64 port that just seems wrong.

jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH]: Allow TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY hook to reduce priority
  - From: Andreas Schwab

References:
- [PATCH]: Allow TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY hook to reduce priority
  - From: John David Anglin
- Re: [PATCH]: Allow TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY hook to reduce priority
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [PATCH]: Allow TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY hook to reduce priority
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH]: Allow TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY hook to reduce priority
  - From: John David Anglin
- Re: [PATCH]: Allow TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_PRIORITY hook to reduce priority
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]