This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch,nvptx] Basic -misa support for nvptx

From: Tom de Vries <tdevries at suse dot de>
To: Cesar Philippidis <cesar at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 08:34:09 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch,nvptx] Basic -misa support for nvptx
References: <cb3a58c5-2336-6290-cbdb-826fc5137fac@codesourcery.com> <b8edf770-2465-6bd2-693c-cc724936f9f7@suse.de> <77123011-edbc-5cbd-ad47-22daf9c55273@codesourcery.com> <5c09f9ef-d3f5-086b-56d6-c8d8895c8f83@codesourcery.com> <a1c7defd-4c16-c2d3-7d32-115dce0ed653@suse.de> <a15354f6-18a0-1745-5a8e-36172e8d17fa@codesourcery.com>

On 09/06/2018 12:24 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> I'll commit the attached patch shortly. x86_64 with nvptx offloading
> regression testing didn't yield any new failures, nor did the standalone
> nvptx testing. I'll follow up with an SImode patch later.

I'm sorry, I guess I was not clear enough here because it's obvious to
me. First apply the SImode patch (enabling the simple case), then follow
up with the DImode patch (enabling the more complex case).

Thanks,
- Tom

References:
- Re: [patch,nvptx] Basic -misa support for nvptx
  - From: Tom de Vries
- Re: [patch,nvptx] Basic -misa support for nvptx
  - From: Cesar Philippidis
- Re: [patch,nvptx] Basic -misa support for nvptx
  - From: Cesar Philippidis
- Re: [patch,nvptx] Basic -misa support for nvptx
  - From: Tom de Vries
- Re: [patch,nvptx] Basic -misa support for nvptx
  - From: Cesar Philippidis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]