This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] look harder for MEM_REF operand equality to avoid -Wstringop-truncation (PR 84561)

On 08/30/2018 02:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:12 AM Martin Sebor <> wrote:

The attached patch adds code to work harder to determine whether
the destination of an assignment involving MEM_REF is the same
as the destination of a prior strncpy call.  The included test
case demonstrates when this situation comes up.  During ccp,
dstbase and lhsbase returned by get_addr_base_and_unit_offset()
end up looking like this:

"During CCP" means exactly when?  The CCP lattice tracks copies
so CCP should already know that _1 == _8.  I suppose during
substitute_and_fold then?  But that replaces uses before folding
the stmt.

Yes, when ccp_finalize() performs the final substitution during


So I'm confused.

   _8 = &pb_3(D)->a;
   _9 = _8;
   _1 = _9;
   strncpy (MEM_REF (&pb_3(D)->a), ...);
   MEM[(struct S *)_1].a[n_7] = 0;

so the loops follow the simple assignments until we get at
the ADDR_EXPR assigned to _8 which is the same as the strncpy

Tested on x86_64-linux.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]