This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][Middle-end]patch for fixing PR 86519


> On Aug 22, 2018, at 10:50 AM, Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> wrote:
> 
> Hi Qing,
> 
>> From the comments you put into PR86519, for SPARC, looks like that only
>> 32-bit sparc has the problem.
>> sparcv9 does NOT have the same issue.
>> 
>> I was trying to find the string to represent 32-bit sparc target, but
>> haven’t found it.
>> 
>> my guess is:   sparc32*-*-*,  is this correct?
> 
> no, certainly not.  You need to use something like sparc*-*-* && ilp32
> to catch the 32-bit multilib in both sparc-*-* and sparcv9-*-*
> configurations.  This is similar to { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && ilp32 on x86.

thanks for the info.

> 
> I'm still doubtful that enumerating target after target which all fail
> the original test for unrelated reasons is the way to go, especially
> given that there are others affected besides mips and sparc.

I am not sure, either.

however, given the available directives provided in testing suite, what’s the better solution
to this problem?

thanks.

Qing
> 
> 	Rainer
> 
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]