This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] PR preprocessor/83173: Additional check before decrementing highest_location


On 05/29/2018 11:25 AM, Mike Gulick wrote:
> On 03/04/2018 02:27 PM, Mike Gulick wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/09/2018 05:54 PM, Mike Gulick wrote:
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Here is a new version of the linemap patch (see my earlier emails for an updated
>>> version of the test code).
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Just wondering if you have had a chance to look at these updated patches
>> yet.  Let me know if you have any questions I can answer, or if there is
>> anything you would like me to do that would make reviewing them easier
>> (reposting, rebasing, refactoring the bug fix from the diagnostics
>> change in the last patch).
>>
>> The most recent postings are:
>> Bug fix patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00557.html
>> Test case: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01993.html
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> Now that gcc 8.1 is out the door, would you have any time to review these
> patches?  I re-tested them after rebasing on the latest git master, and
> everything still behaved as expected.  I can post the rebased patches if you
> would like, but it was a trivial merge with no conflicts.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 

I'd still like to get this bug fixed.  I don't think I need the [RFC] tag any
more on these patches.  Should I post a new thread to this list to get the ball
rolling again?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]