This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Handle overlength strings in the C FE

From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu dot edu>
Cc: Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com>, Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 22:09:08 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle overlength strings in the C FE
References: <AM5PR0701MB26577C800216899DCF6647E6E42F0@AM5PR0701MB2657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807301547470.17805@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <AM5PR0701MB26578DF7C6DA998944B41E5BE42D0@AM5PR0701MB2657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <49903afb-c647-5f15-f51b-80f132e18850@gmail.com> <CAMfHzOtuf8rcS+Wq20t4QU7NvyAxmzDpw0bYTzL0aNXe+QUcPw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Eric Gallager wrote:

> While modifying -Woverlength-strings, I think a good way to test it

The -Woverlength-strings option (warn about string constants longer than 
the minimum guaranteed by the C standard to be supported) has nothing 
whatever to do with the present patch discussion (which relates to string 
constants longer than the array they are used as an initializer for).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- [PATCH] Handle overlength strings in the C FE
  - From: Bernd Edlinger
- Re: [PATCH] Handle overlength strings in the C FE
  - From: Martin Sebor
- Re: [PATCH] Handle overlength strings in the C FE
  - From: Eric Gallager

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]