This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Fwd: [PATCH, rs6000] Replace __uint128_t and __int128_t with __uint128 and __int128 in Power PC built-in documentation
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- To: Kelvin Nilsen <kdnilsen at linux dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:54:20 -0500
- Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH, rs6000] Replace __uint128_t and __int128_t with __uint128 and __int128 in Power PC built-in documentation
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:40:01AM -0500, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> To improve internal consistency and to improve consistency with published ABI documents, this patch replaces the __uint128_t type with __uint128 and replaces __int128_t with __int128.
> Is this ok for trunk?
Looks good, thanks! Most (all?) of these functions are not documented
in the ABI, but this is a step forward anyway. Okay for trunk.
What do things like error messages involving these functions look like?
What types do those say?