This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [35/46] Alter interfaces within vect_pattern_recog
- From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, richard dot sandiford at arm dot com
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:14:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: [35/46] Alter interfaces within vect_pattern_recog
- References: <87wotlrmen.fsf@arm.com> <87pnzdlzgl.fsf@arm.com>
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:06 PM Richard Sandiford
<richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
>
> vect_pattern_recog_1 took a gimple_stmt_iterator as argument, but was
> only interested in the gsi_stmt, not anything else. This patch makes
> the associated routines operate directly on stmt_vec_infos.
OK
>
> 2018-07-24 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
>
> gcc/
> * tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_mark_pattern_stmts): Take the
> original stmt as a stmt_vec_info rather than a gimple stmt.
> (vect_pattern_recog_1): Take the statement directly as a
> stmt_vec_info, rather than via a gimple_stmt_iterator.
> Update call to vect_mark_pattern_stmts.
> (vect_pattern_recog): Update calls accordingly.
>
> Index: gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c 2018-07-24 10:23:50.004602150 +0100
> +++ gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c 2018-07-24 10:23:59.408518638 +0100
> @@ -4720,29 +4720,29 @@ const unsigned int NUM_PATTERNS = ARRAY_
> /* Mark statements that are involved in a pattern. */
>
> static inline void
> -vect_mark_pattern_stmts (gimple *orig_stmt, gimple *pattern_stmt,
> +vect_mark_pattern_stmts (stmt_vec_info orig_stmt_info, gimple *pattern_stmt,
> tree pattern_vectype)
> {
> - stmt_vec_info orig_stmt_info = vinfo_for_stmt (orig_stmt);
> gimple *def_seq = STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ (orig_stmt_info);
>
> - bool old_pattern_p = is_pattern_stmt_p (orig_stmt_info);
> - if (old_pattern_p)
> + gimple *orig_pattern_stmt = NULL;
> + if (is_pattern_stmt_p (orig_stmt_info))
> {
> /* We're replacing a statement in an existing pattern definition
> sequence. */
> + orig_pattern_stmt = orig_stmt_info->stmt;
> if (dump_enabled_p ())
> {
> dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
> "replacing earlier pattern ");
> - dump_gimple_stmt (MSG_NOTE, TDF_SLIM, orig_stmt, 0);
> + dump_gimple_stmt (MSG_NOTE, TDF_SLIM, orig_pattern_stmt, 0);
> }
>
> /* To keep the book-keeping simple, just swap the lhs of the
> old and new statements, so that the old one has a valid but
> unused lhs. */
> - tree old_lhs = gimple_get_lhs (orig_stmt);
> - gimple_set_lhs (orig_stmt, gimple_get_lhs (pattern_stmt));
> + tree old_lhs = gimple_get_lhs (orig_pattern_stmt);
> + gimple_set_lhs (orig_pattern_stmt, gimple_get_lhs (pattern_stmt));
> gimple_set_lhs (pattern_stmt, old_lhs);
>
> if (dump_enabled_p ())
> @@ -4755,7 +4755,8 @@ vect_mark_pattern_stmts (gimple *orig_st
> orig_stmt_info = STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT (orig_stmt_info);
>
> /* We shouldn't be replacing the main pattern statement. */
> - gcc_assert (STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT (orig_stmt_info) != orig_stmt);
> + gcc_assert (STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT (orig_stmt_info)->stmt
> + != orig_pattern_stmt);
> }
>
> if (def_seq)
> @@ -4763,13 +4764,14 @@ vect_mark_pattern_stmts (gimple *orig_st
> !gsi_end_p (si); gsi_next (&si))
> vect_init_pattern_stmt (gsi_stmt (si), orig_stmt_info, pattern_vectype);
>
> - if (old_pattern_p)
> + if (orig_pattern_stmt)
> {
> vect_init_pattern_stmt (pattern_stmt, orig_stmt_info, pattern_vectype);
>
> /* Insert all the new pattern statements before the original one. */
> gimple_seq *orig_def_seq = &STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ (orig_stmt_info);
> - gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (orig_stmt, orig_def_seq);
> + gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (orig_pattern_stmt,
> + orig_def_seq);
> gsi_insert_seq_before_without_update (&gsi, def_seq, GSI_SAME_STMT);
> gsi_insert_before_without_update (&gsi, pattern_stmt, GSI_SAME_STMT);
>
> @@ -4785,12 +4787,12 @@ vect_mark_pattern_stmts (gimple *orig_st
> Input:
> PATTERN_RECOG_FUNC: A pointer to a function that detects a certain
> computation pattern.
> - STMT: A stmt from which the pattern search should start.
> + STMT_INFO: A stmt from which the pattern search should start.
>
> If PATTERN_RECOG_FUNC successfully detected the pattern, it creates
> a sequence of statements that has the same functionality and can be
> - used to replace STMT. It returns the last statement in the sequence
> - and adds any earlier statements to STMT's STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ.
> + used to replace STMT_INFO. It returns the last statement in the sequence
> + and adds any earlier statements to STMT_INFO's STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ.
> PATTERN_RECOG_FUNC also sets *TYPE_OUT to the vector type of the final
> statement, having first checked that the target supports the new operation
> in that type.
> @@ -4799,10 +4801,10 @@ vect_mark_pattern_stmts (gimple *orig_st
> for vect_recog_pattern. */
>
> static void
> -vect_pattern_recog_1 (vect_recog_func *recog_func, gimple_stmt_iterator si)
> +vect_pattern_recog_1 (vect_recog_func *recog_func, stmt_vec_info stmt_info)
> {
> - gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (si), *pattern_stmt;
> - stmt_vec_info stmt_info;
> + vec_info *vinfo = stmt_info->vinfo;
> + gimple *pattern_stmt;
> loop_vec_info loop_vinfo;
> tree pattern_vectype;
>
> @@ -4810,13 +4812,12 @@ vect_pattern_recog_1 (vect_recog_func *r
> leave the original statement alone, since the first match wins.
> Instead try to match against the definition statements that feed
> the main pattern statement. */
> - stmt_info = vinfo_for_stmt (stmt);
> if (STMT_VINFO_IN_PATTERN_P (stmt_info))
> {
> gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
> for (gsi = gsi_start (STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ (stmt_info));
> !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
> - vect_pattern_recog_1 (recog_func, gsi);
> + vect_pattern_recog_1 (recog_func, vinfo->lookup_stmt (gsi_stmt (gsi)));
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -4841,7 +4842,7 @@ vect_pattern_recog_1 (vect_recog_func *r
> }
>
> /* Mark the stmts that are involved in the pattern. */
> - vect_mark_pattern_stmts (stmt, pattern_stmt, pattern_vectype);
> + vect_mark_pattern_stmts (stmt_info, pattern_stmt, pattern_vectype);
>
> /* Patterns cannot be vectorized using SLP, because they change the order of
> computation. */
> @@ -4957,9 +4958,13 @@ vect_pattern_recog (vec_info *vinfo)
> {
> basic_block bb = bbs[i];
> for (si = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (si); gsi_next (&si))
> - /* Scan over all generic vect_recog_xxx_pattern functions. */
> - for (j = 0; j < NUM_PATTERNS; j++)
> - vect_pattern_recog_1 (&vect_vect_recog_func_ptrs[j], si);
> + {
> + stmt_vec_info stmt_info = vinfo->lookup_stmt (gsi_stmt (si));
> + /* Scan over all generic vect_recog_xxx_pattern functions. */
> + for (j = 0; j < NUM_PATTERNS; j++)
> + vect_pattern_recog_1 (&vect_vect_recog_func_ptrs[j],
> + stmt_info);
> + }
> }
> }
> else
> @@ -4975,7 +4980,7 @@ vect_pattern_recog (vec_info *vinfo)
>
> /* Scan over all generic vect_recog_xxx_pattern functions. */
> for (j = 0; j < NUM_PATTERNS; j++)
> - vect_pattern_recog_1 (&vect_vect_recog_func_ptrs[j], si);
> + vect_pattern_recog_1 (&vect_vect_recog_func_ptrs[j], stmt_info);
> }
> }
> }