This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at charter dot net>
To: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:37:18 -0700
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified
References: <CAGkQGiL0eF56n+YWwrkyk0ujXaSe+3u0gHSEMUvunhSRP-BsYw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGkQGiKJSOrjYgQvr=YswvA_xm01BLBXhqkNr+gYfb0vVW7W-w@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/27/2018 06:48 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:

I posted a patch for this on the PR in August 2010. Dominique pointed
out that it caused repeated error messages in some testcases; eg.
arithmetic_overflow_1.f90

As it happens, that seems to have crept in at some time even without
the patch for this PR. Nevertheless, I have modified the patch
slightly to prevent any more escalation. Apart from this, the patch is
very straightforward.

Bootstraps and regtests on FC28/x86_64 - OK for trunk and....?

Paul

Well this goes way back. OK for trunk. If you want to backport to 7 and8, your choice.


Jerry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]