This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Add checking that during RTL bbs don't mix EH and non-complex predecessor edges
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 09:09:29 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add checking that during RTL bbs don't mix EH and non-complex predecessor edges
- References: <20180615190616.GE7166@tucnak> <1836476.WAVuKaT7kL@polaris> <20180615205254.GJ7166@tucnak> <1758596.7rTAqRSlp7@polaris>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:33:10PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > So like this (if it passes another bootstrap/regtest together with the
> > cfgrtl.c change)? It fixes the testcase too.
> >
> > 2018-06-15 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
> >
> > PR rtl-optimization/86108
> > * bb-reorder.c (create_forwarder_block): Renamed to ...
> > (create_eh_forwarder_block): ... this. Split OLD_BB after labels and
> > jump from new landing pad to the second part.
> > (sjlj_fix_up_crossing_landing_pad, dw2_fix_up_crossing_landing_pad):
> > Adjust callers.
>
> OK, thanks. I'll build the Ada compiler on x86/Windows once this is in.
Now committed after successful bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux. Is the cfgrtl.c change ok for trunk too?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00967.html
Jakub