This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, rs6000] clean up vec_neg related test options
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- To: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt at vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 17:16:19 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] clean up vec_neg related test options
- References: <1528835120.27596.9.camel@brimstone.rchland.ibm.com>
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:25:20PM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote:
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-neg-int.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-neg-int.c
> @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
> /* Verify that overloaded built-ins for vec_neg with int
> inputs produce the right code. */
>
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */
> -/* { dg-options "-maltivec -O2" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p8vector_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-mpower8-vector -maltivec -O2" } */
So this test now will only run on systems that support -mpower8-vector.
Is that okay? If so, okay for trunk. Thanks!
Segher