Re: Improve std::rotate usages

[François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>]

I'm struggling having a validation for this patch.

As it is a trivial one and to not bother you I plan to commit it 
tomorrow if not told otherwise.

François



On 08/06/2018 07:54, François Dumont wrote:
> Gentle reminder.
>
> On 27/05/2018 19:25, François Dumont wrote:
> > Still no chance to review it ?
> >
> > I'd like this one to go in before submitting other algo related patches.
> >
> >     * include/bits/stl_algo.h
> >     (__rotate(_Ite, _Ite, _Ite, forward_iterator_tag))
> >     (__rotate(_Ite, _Ite, _Ite, bidirectional_iterator_tag))
> >     (__rotate(_Ite, _Ite, _Ite, random_access_iterator_tag)): Move 
> > code duplication...
> >     (rotate(_Ite, _Ite, _Ite)): ...here.
> >     (__stable_partition_adaptive(_FIt, _FIt, _Pred, _Dist, _Pointer, 
> > _Dist)):
> >     Simplify rotate call.
> >     (__rotate_adaptive(_BIt1, _BIt1, _BIt1, _Dist, _Dist, _Bit2, 
> > _Dist)):
> >     Likewise.
> >     (__merge_without_buffer(_BIt, _BIt, _BIt, _Dist, _Dist, _Comp)):
> >     Likewise.
> >
> > François
> >
> > On 14/05/2018 22:14, François Dumont wrote:
> > > Any feedback regarding this patch ?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 02/05/2018 07:26, François Dumont wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > >     std::rotate already returns the expected iterator so there is 
> > > > no need for calls to std::advance/std::distance.
> > > >
> > > > Tested under Linux x86_64, ok to commit ?
> > > >
> > > > François