Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Undefine vector, bool, pixel in xmmintrin.h

[Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux dot ibm dot com>]

On Apr 4, 2018, at 3:51 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 03:47:18PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>>> If we (for GCC9?) want to create a spot for target C++ tests, we should
>>> just add g++.target/<cpu>/ directories and add all the needed infrastructure
>>> for those.
>>> 
>>> Can you please revert the powerpc.exp change and move the test to
>>> g++.dg/ext/ ?  Thanks.
>> 
>> Sure, I can -- I just want to point out that there is precedent here.  I noticed
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> that gcc.target/s390/s390.exp allows .C suffixes and there is one such
>> (compile-only) test in that directory, so I assumed the framework was okay
>> for this.
> 
> Yes, and apparently aarch64 and arm have a couple of *.C tests too.
> Still it doesn't feel right, running C++ tests under make check-gcc rather
> than check-g++ is just weird.
> 
> I think we should just introduce g++.target/ in GCC9 and move those tests
> there, plus any g++.dg/ tests guarded for single targets only.  g++.target
> should do the -std=c++{98,11,14,17,2a} cycling etc.

Agreed.  I'll take a note about this for GCC9.

Thanks,
Bill