This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] [PR c++/84943] allow folding of array indexing indirect_ref

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Nathan Sidwell <nathan at acm dot org>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:55:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PR c++/84943] allow folding of array indexing indirect_ref
References: <ork1u3k95q.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org> <CADzB+2k6sJiQcZ+u5iAAdh=SAPy5ie4rZnjg6vFmakPYORmz4Q@mail.gmail.com> <orwoy2py0o.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org> <CADzB+2nnSeH1Oe37kG9iWVMrgBGwgxNDKE0SWP9oFqJYvDXR_Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> Seems like cp_fold should update CALL_EXPR_FN with "callee" if non-null.

Did you try this?  That should avoid it being ADDR_EXPR of a decl.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] [PR c++/84943] allow folding of array indexing indirect_ref
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- [PATCH] [PR c++/84943] allow folding of array indexing indirect_ref
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PATCH] [PR c++/84943] allow folding of array indexing indirect_ref
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [PATCH] [PR c++/84943] allow folding of array indexing indirect_ref
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PATCH] [PR c++/84943] allow folding of array indexing indirect_ref
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]