This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA PATCH] Bug 84094 - several correctness issues in gfortran.dg
- From: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
- To: Dominique d'Humières <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>
- Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 13:14:49 +0000
- Subject: Re: [RFA PATCH] Bug 84094 - several correctness issues in gfortran.dg
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CB3785CC-5438-4EB5-B828-B763CCCB20B2@lps.ens.fr>
Hi Dominique,
The patch is OK.
By all means open the PR for the missing/confusing diagnostics.
Thanks
Paul
On 4 February 2018 at 13:01, Dominique d'Humières <dominiq@lps.ens.fr> wrote:
> Is the following patch OK? For associate_23.f90 I have restricted should_work to two elements, an alternative would be to use ASSOCIATE(should_work=>char_var_dim(1:3)); any preference?
>
> Note that none of these invalid codes are detected by gfortran, except intrinsic_actual_4.f90 which gives a confusing warning
>
> i = len ("123")
> 1
> Warning: Type specified for intrinsic function 'len' at (1) is ignored [-Wsurprising]
>
> when compiled with -Wall.
>
> Should I open PRs for these missing/confusing diagnostics?
>
> TIA
>
> Dominique
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/matmul_3.f90 2009-11-25 18:17:41.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/matmul_3.f90 2018-02-04 13:25:39.000000000 +0100
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> iX2(1:n,1) = matmul( iB(2,1:n),iC(1:n,1:n) )
>
> ! Whereas, we should have 8, 8, 99
> - if (any (iX1(1:n,1) .ne. (/8, 8, 99/))) call abort ()
> + if (any (iX1(1:n+1,1) .ne. (/8, 8, 99/))) call abort ()
> if (any (iX1 .ne. iX2)) call abort ()
>
> ! Make sure that the fix does not break transpose temporaries.
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_23.f90 2016-11-04 20:34:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/associate_23.f90 2018-02-04 13:28:18.000000000 +0100
> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ program test_this
>
> ! Found to be failing during debugging
> ASSOCIATE(should_work=>char_var_dim(1:2))
> - should_work = ["test SUCCESFUL", "test_SUCCESFUL", "test.SUCCESFUL"]
> +! should_work = ["test SUCCESFUL", "test_SUCCESFUL", "test.SUCCESFUL"]
> + should_work = ["test SUCCESFUL", "test_SUCCESFUL"]
> write (buffer, *) should_work(:)(5:14)
> END ASSOCIATE
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/transfer_array_intrinsic_2.f90 2009-11-25 18:17:42.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/transfer_array_intrinsic_2.f90 2018-02-04 13:40:17.000000000 +0100
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ contains
> ch(1:2) = transfer (y, ch, 2)
> if (any (ch(1:2) .ne. (/"ABCD","EFGH"/))) call abort ()
>
> - z = transfer (ch, y)
> + z = transfer (ch, y, 2)
> if (any (y(1:2) .ne. z)) call abort ()
>
> end subroutine test2
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_4.f90 2009-11-25 18:17:49.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_4.f90 2018-02-04 13:48:05.000000000 +0100
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>
> implicit none
> integer i
> + intrinsic len
> i = len ("123")
> call sub (len, "abcdef")
> end
>
--
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein