RE: [patch][x86] -march=icelake

["Koval, Julia" <julia dot koval at intel dot com>]

Renamed it. Ok for trunk?

gcc/c-family/
	* c-common.h (omp_clause_mask): Move to wide_int_bitmask.h

gcc/
	* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Change flags type to
	wide_int_bitmask.
	* wide-int-bitmask.h: New.

Thanks,
Julia


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Biener [mailto:rguenther@suse.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:18 PM
> To: Koval, Julia <julia.koval@intel.com>
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>; Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>; GCC
> Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [patch][x86] -march=icelake
> 
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Koval, Julia wrote:
> 
> > I think we may want to extend it to more than 2 ints someday, when we run
> out of bits again. It won't break the existing functionality if 3rd int will be zero by
> default. That's why I tried to avoid "two" in the name.
> >
> > Julia
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:jakub@redhat.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 12:06 PM
> > > To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>; Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> > > Cc: Koval, Julia <julia.koval@intel.com>; GCC Patches <gcc-
> > > patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [patch][x86] -march=icelake
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:00:26PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Koval, Julia <julia.koval@intel.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > Yes, you are right, any() is not required. Here is the patch.
> > > >
> > > > Please also attach ChangeLog.
> > > >
> > > > The patch is OK for x86 target, it needs global reviewer approval
> > > > (Maybe Jakub, as the patch touches OMP part).
> > >
> > > I don't like the new class name nor header name, bit_mask is way too
> generic
> > > name for something very specialized (double hwi bitmask).
> > >
> > > Richard, any suggestions for this?
> 
> Maybe wide_int_bitmask?  You could then even use fixed_wide_int <> as
> "implementation".
> 
> Richard.

Attachment: 0001-bitmask.patch
Description: 0001-bitmask.patch